H.R. 7567 · 119th Congress
Farm Bill 2.0
Title 2 · Conservation Expanded § 2801–2807

RCPP, Regional Conservation Partnership Program

Drought and flood mitigation added to eligible resource concerns. Partnership agreement requirements streamlined. Funding maintained at $450M annually FY2027–FY2031. Wildlife connectivity added as a critical conservation area priority.

Funding
$450M annually FY2027-2031 (+$110M total over 10 years)

What RCPP does

The Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) leverages partnerships with eligible entities (states, Indian Tribes, conservation organizations, NGOs) to address conservation concerns at a regional or watershed scale. Federal funds flow through partners; partners contribute matching resources and expertise.

RCPP allows USDA to support projects that wouldn’t fit cleanly into single-program structures, combining EQIP, CSP, ACEP, CRP, FCEP, and Watershed Operations elements into integrated landscape projects.

What changed in the Farm Bill 2.0

1. Drought and flood mitigation added

Resource concerns eligible for RCPP now explicitly include drought mitigation and flood prevention. This was a quiet but consequential addition, RCPP is increasingly being used for water security projects.

2. Wildlife connectivity added

Critical Conservation Areas under RCPP now include wildlife connectivity and wildlife migration corridors as priority resource concerns.

3. Partnership agreements streamlined

  • Partnership agreements must now be entered into within 180 days of selection
  • Payments must be made within 30 days of request (under funding agreements)
  • Up to 10% of funds can reimburse partner administrative expenses
  • Time limit removed for advanced funding

4. FCEP added to covered programs

The Forest Conservation Easement Program (Title II’s new program) is now an RCPP-covered program. HFRP is removed (since it’s repealed).

5. Funding maintained

RCPP gets $450 million annually for FY2027–FY2031, net increase of $110M over 10 years.

6. Other changes

  • EQIP irrigation history exclusion: RCPP partnerships using EQIP can’t consider prior irrigation history when determining eligible land
  • Streamlined partner-led projects: alternative funding agreements have more flexibility
  • Public reporting required for RCPP project status

Who RCPP matters for

  • Watershed-scale conservation projects: multi-county or multi-state initiatives
  • State and tribal conservation programs: leveraging federal funds for state priorities
  • Agricultural NGOs and conservation organizations: accessing federal resources for landscape work
  • Wildlife habitat connectivity initiatives: newly prioritized

How RCPP differs from EQIP

FactorEQIPRCPP
ApplicationDirect to USDAThrough eligible partner
ScaleIndividual operationLandscape/watershed
MatchingProducer cost-sharePartner contribution + producer cost-share
Best forSpecific practicesCoordinated regional efforts

Track every Senate move.

One short email a week. Senate progress, amendment fights, program deadlines. No fluff.

2,847 farmers and ag pros already on the list.