Amendments Adopted on the House Floor
Floor amendments to H.R. 7567 (Farm Bill 2026) that are confirmed by a House Clerk roll call, sponsor, amendment number, result, and exact tally. Verified votes only.
What this page covers
During House floor consideration of H.R. 7567 on April 30, 2026, members offered amendments made in order by the House Rules Committee. This page lists only the floor amendments whose author, amendment number, result, and vote tally we can confirm against an Office of the Clerk roll call.
Other amendments were disposed of by voice vote or en bloc and do not have an individual recorded roll call. We do not assign vote counts to those, because no primary source records member-by-member numbers for them. The complete amendment record, including made-in-order text and voice votes, is published by the House Rules Committee. The bill has passed the House but has not become law; the changes below would take effect only if the bill is enacted.
Roll-call-verified floor amendments
Crawford amendment, hot rotisserie chicken under SNAP
If H.R. 7567 is enacted in this form, the amendment would make hot rotisserie chicken eligible for SNAP purchase.
Luna amendment, strikes section 12006
House Rules describes the amendment as striking section 12006, relating to free movement of livestock-derived products in interstate commerce.
The rotisserie chicken amendment (Roll Call 145)
Rep. Crawford's amendment was agreed to 384–35, one of the more lopsided recorded votes of the day. If H.R. 7567 is enacted in this form, it would make hot rotisserie chicken eligible for SNAP purchase, where current rules generally limit SNAP to cold or unheated foods. We describe this as a prospective change because the bill is not yet law. The result and tally are taken directly from the Clerk's roll call.
The Luna amendment to strike section 12006 (Roll Call 148)
Rep. Luna's Part B Amendment No. 28 was agreed to 280–142. The House Rules Committee describes this amendment as striking section 12006, relating to the free movement of livestock-derived products in interstate commerce.
We previously characterized this vote as stripping a pesticide-preemption provision and limiting pesticide manufacturer liability. We have removed that description: it is not supported by the House Rules amendment record, which ties Amendment No. 28 to section 12006, not to pesticide labeling or tort liability. If you are tracking pesticide-preemption language specifically, consult the bill text and the Rules Committee print directly rather than relying on a single floor-vote summary.
How we decide what to list here
An amendment appears on this page only when an Office of the Clerk roll call records its author, amendment number, result, and tally. If those facts are not confirmed by a primary source, the amendment is not displayed with a vote count. This keeps the page limited to facts we can point to in an official record.